Categories
Movie Review

The Quest (1996)

logoDirector: Jean-Claude Van Damme

Writer: Steve Klein, Paul Mones (Screenplay) Jean-Claude Van Damme, Frank Dux (Story)

Starring: Jean-Claude Van Damme, Roger Moore, James Remar, Jaet Gunn, Jack McGee, Aki Aleong, Abdel Qissi

 

Plot: Chris embarks on an odyssey of self-discovery that spans the globe. Kidnapped and enslaved by gun smugglers, sold by pirates and thrust into the murky underworld of gambling and kickboxing, Chris’ journey takes him to forbidding Muay Thai Island where deadly martial arts are taught, the colonial splendor of British East Asia, the dank back alleys of Bangkok, desolate deserts once trod by the warriors of Genghis Khan and finally, the ancient Lost City. There he must face the ultimate test of his manhood in the fabled Ghang-gheng, the ancient winner-take-all competition in which the deadliest fighters from around the world employ the most spectacular feats of martial arts skills ever displayed in order to win the prized Golden Dragon. But fighting prowess alone will not be enough for Chris to triumph over such daunting foes. He must reach deep inside and access all of the determination, strength of character and sense of selfless honor within in order to triumph over this final obstacle on his long trek home.

 

Verdict: Fighting Champion minus the Intensity

 

Story: We all know that Jean-Claude Van Damme films are designed to show off his fighting skills and the story is not a priority. We do have a loose storyline following a man being captured, tricked but fights back with the skills he has learned. We get the world fighting champions from all over the world into battles which sadly only last a matter of seconds each time around. The support characters are very stereotyped to be known for each generic fighting style and it isn’t difficult to work out what will happen at the end. (6/10)

 

Actor Review

 

Jean-Claude Van Damme: Christopher the street criminal who gets captured and sold to an island for fighting only for his mission to compete in the championship becomes a reality. Typical Van Damme performance great fighting, poor dialogue. (7/10)

jcvd

Roger Moore: Lord Edgar a pirate who just wants to make as much money as he can as quick as he can even if he walks all over people. Basic performance from Moore who openly says this is his least favourite role. (4/10)

moore

James Remar: Maxie the American champion who gives up his chance to fight when he sees Christopher’s fighting technique. Good supporting performance but becomes a gloried cheerleader by the end of the film. (6/10)

 

Director Review: Jean-Claude Van Damme– He knows how to put some good fight sequences together but the rest he struggles to keep the attention. (6/10)

 

Action: The fights are good, but nothing special. (7/10)

Thriller: The fights are too short to really grab you in. (5/10)

Settings: Good generic settings created. (5/10)

Suggestion: This is for all those Van Damme fans out there not many more people will enjoy this. (Van Damme Fans)

 

Best Part: The fights.

Worst Part: The journey

Action Scene Of The Film: The final fight.

Believability: (0/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: No

Post Credits Scene: No

 

Oscar Chances: No

Box Office: $57 Million

Budget: $30 Million

Runtime: 1 Hour 35 Minutes

Tagline: A lost city, A man of destiny, A test of honour.

 

Overall: B Class Fighting Film

Rating 55

Categories
Movie Review

Rites Of Spring (2011)

logoDirector: Padraig Reynolds

Writer: Padraig Reynolds (Screenplay)

Starring: AJ Bowen, Anessa Ramsey, Sonny Marinelli, Katherine Randolph, James Bartz, Shanna Forrestall, Andrew Breland, Hannah Bryan

 

Plot: When two friends Rachel (Ramsey) and Alyssa (Bryan) get kidnapped by a strange man, he starts to prepare them for some form of ritual. Next to this story we have a group of kidnappers Paul (Marinelli) Ben (Bowan) and Amy (Randolph) kidnap a rich man Ryan (Bartz) daughter for a money exchange. Soon these characters all have to join forces to face a creature that likes to take people’s heads.

 

Verdict: A nice tale with plenty of mystery but not enough conviction

Story: Mixing the stories together it becomes clear that it is some clever story telling but some huge plot hole issues cause me a big question. One such problem is with the man who kidnaps the girls doesn’t secure them well enough even after years of performing the ritual. It is a brave attempt to create different characters who end up joining forces but they never get enough time against the creature. (6/10)

 

Actor Review: Anessa Ramsey – Rachel, the one that escapes but her guilty feelings cause her problems. Good scream like performance but her over panic for nothing and her under panic for other things confuse the performance. (4/10)

 rachel

Actor Review: AJ Bowan – Ben his motives for his kidnapping are good and his actions are to make sure it is clean. It is s good calm performance but nothing that really shines. (5/10)

ben

Actor Review: Sonny Marinelli – Paul the leader of the gang has a much darker side than Ben. Good villainous role which leads to most conflict. (6/10)

 

Director Review: Padraig Reynolds – Good attempt in creating a twisty horror but it never reaches the levels it should do. (6/10)

 

Horror: Never gets to true jump levels needed for the creature creation. (6/10)

Thriller: Doesn’t build up enough to make anything impact. (5/10)

Special Effects: Some good death scenes created. (7/10)

The Creature
The Creature

Believability: Part of it could be seen as believable following the kidnapping side but the horror side no. (4/10)

Chances of Tears: no (0/10)

Settings: Few different isolated locations which add to horror being created. (7/10)

Suggestion: This is one that only horror fan see but it is only one that should try it isn’t anything special and will soon been forgotten. (Horror Fans Try)

 

Best Part: The potential of a new horror creature.

Worst Part: It fails to create a new horror creature.

Kill Of The Film: The Creature

Oscar Chances: No

Chances of Sequel: Maybe but unlikely

 

Overall: A horror that lacks the fight it should have

Rating 57

Categories
Movie Review

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)

logoDirector: Marc Webb

Writer: Alex Kurtzman, Robert Orci, Jeff Pinkner, James Vanderbilt (Screenplay) Stan Lee, Steve Ditko (Marvel Comic Book)

Starring: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Dane DeHaan, Colm Feore, Felicity Jones, Paul Giamatti, Sally Field, Embeth Davidtz, Campbell Scott

 

Plot: We’ve always known that Spider-Man’s most important conflict has been within himself: the struggle between the ordinary obligations of Peter Parker and the extraordinary responsibilities of Spider-Man. But in The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Peter Parker finds that his greatest battle is about to begin. It’s great to be Spider-Man. For Peter Parker, there’s no feeling quite like swinging between skyscrapers, embracing being the hero, and spending time with Gwen. But being Spider-Man comes at a price: only Spider-Man can protect his fellow New Yorkers from the formidable villains that threaten the city. With the emergence of Electro, Peter must confront a foe far more powerful than he. And as his old friend, Harry Osborn, returns, Peter comes to realize that all of his enemies have one thing in common: Oscorp.

 

Verdict: Spider-Man Growing Up

 

Story: This follows up from the first one so we have to remember unlike the Avengers and Dark Knight we are dealing with a teenage superhero. He has different problems like whether he wants a girlfriend or whether to go to college, you know the serious stuff. We have him putting out all the cheesy lines against the person he fights not taking anything seriously. While Peter is trying to figure out what his life holds next, the people against him start their own stories. We have the generic loner scientist who ends up having an accident, gaining powers and using them for evil, been there seen that in every Spider-man film. We also have the Harry Osborn who wants Spider-Man’s blood to cure his sickness and when he can’t have it he goes on a rampage against Spider-Man. It would be fair this is a slow moving film and it really is building up for the next chapter. (7/10)

 

Actor Review

 

Andrew Garfield: Spider-Man/Peter Parker while trying to figure out what to do with his life he carries on fighting crime, he has to decide whether to keep with his girlfriend when her father’s dying wish was to leave her so she couldn’t get caught up in trouble. He does ends up having to face the biggest battle of his life after his battles with Electro and Green Goblin. Good performance in a character that develops as the film unfolds. (8/10)

 spide

Emma Stone: Gwen Stacy ambitious girlfriend of Peter, who wants to excel in her studies and gets that chance to but with Peter in her life she will always be in danger. Good supporting performance, but I always find relationships for superheroes only get in the way and annoy. (7/10)

emma

Jamie Foxx: Electro lonely scientist who has helped the city design a better power source. He feels like everyone is against him but when Spider-Man saves him he gets a boost of confidence. Just when things look good for Max he ends up having an accident at work and turning into Electro, who starts off just wanting help but when he feels betrayed by Spider-Man he wants to take out the web-slinger and the city. Good performance playing a very difficult character that really looks the part. (8/10)

 eletrco

Dane DeHaan: Green Goblin/Harry Osborn an old friend of Peter who wants him to find Spider-Man so he can use his blood to cure his terminal illness. After both Peter and Spider-Man refuse for safety reason he finds out his company secretly has some stored away and he uses it and becomes the Green Goblin out to stop Spider-Man. Good performance from the always solid Dane. (8/10)

harry

Director Review: Marc Webb – Great direction creating a story that really is building to something bigger, creating some very memorable fight scenes and a villain in Electro like nothing we have seen before. (8/10)

 

Action: When the action happens it is all very good, with some great camera spinning shots of Spider-Man in battle. (8/10)

Superhero: A solid entry in the superhero genre. (8/10)

Settings: New York makes a great setting because without all the building Spider-Man couldn’t swing as much. (9/10)
Special Effects
: Great special effects used throughout the film. (10/10)

Suggestion: This must be watch by all the superhero fans out there, it is creating a big picture without having to use separate films to add to one of franchise. (Superhero Fans Watch)

 

Best Part: Spider-Man battles Electro round two.

Worst Part: It does start slow, nearly an hour before we meet Electro.

Action Scene Of The Film: The final battles

Believability: No (0/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: Has one planned

Post Credits Scene: No

 

Oscar Chances: No

Box Office: $708 Million

Budget: $200 Million

Runtime: 2 Hours 22 Minutes

Tagline: His greatest battle begins

 

Overall: Solid Addition to Spider-Man Franchise

Rating 76

Categories
Movie Review

One Lovely Blog Award

awardI have been nominated for the One Lovely Blog Award by Horrorville. I would like to thank Horrorville for the nomination and if you want to know horror films check out the site.

This is my first nomination I have had, it has shown that my hard work has been getting noticed and I would like to thank everyone who has read any of my posts.

Here are the rules for this award:

  1. You must thank the person who nominated you and include a link to their blog.
  2. You must list the rules and display the award.
  3. You must add 7 facts about yourself.
  4. You must nominate 15 other bloggers and comment on one of their posts to let them know they have been nominated.
  5. You must display the award logo and follow the blogger who nominated you.

7 facts about me

  • I wish to become a film critic
  • I would like to write my own film screenplay
  • I own too many films
  • I struggle through depression
  • I wish I could become a writer
  • I only got a D in English at school
  • It’s My Life is my favourite karaoke song.

I nominate

 

I would like to thank everyone one more time for reading my posts and look forward to hearing your thoughts on all the upcoming films I will be talking about.

Categories
Movie Review

The Green Hornet (2011)

loggoDirector: Michel Gondry

Writer: Seth Rogen, Evan Goldberg (Screenplay) George W. Trendle (Radio Series)

Starring: Seth Rogen, Jay Chou, Cameron Diaz, Tom Wilkinson, Christoph Waltz, David Harbour, Edward James Olmos

 

Plot: Playboy Britt Reid (Seth Rogen) becomes the new publisher of Los Angeles’ “The Daily Sentinel” after the sudden death of his father. Britt’s party life is about to change when he and his driver and kung fu expert, Kato (Jay Chou), stop a robbery. With the help of Kato, Britt starts a new career of fighting crime as the masked superhero “The Green Hornet”.

 

Verdict: TV Show Returns

 

Story: With all the action superhero films out there, this actually comes of refreshing in the world where one man tries to fight back against crime. Mixing elements of a Batman type action film into not taking itself too serious and adding a hint of comedy. Granted the overall story is not original, it is just fun, it plays to every stars strength and is often over criticised unfairly. (7/10)

 

Actor Review

 

Seth Rogen: Britt Reid/ The Green Hornet the playboy son who decides to go and start fighting crime with his new friend Kato, while using his family’s newspaper to make his Hornet’s reputation rise. This is bread and butter for Rogen you know what you will get and he enters the action world with his comedy well. (7/10)

 seth

Jay Chou:  Kato the family mechanic who also makes a great cup of coffee, he uses his combat skills to help fight crime but is only ever considered the sidekick to the loud mouth Britt. Good performance who usually steals all the scenes he is in. (8/10)

kato

Cameron Diaz: Lenore the new secretary for Britt at the paper who has the skills that knows how to do the reporting and research Britt is too lazy to do. Good supporting performance and works well in the anti-romantic interest role. (7/10)

 cameron

Christoph Waltz: Chudnofsky the ruthless criminal boss who has control on the city but no one considers him scary, which gets on his nerves leading to his trigger finger to start killing. Good villain performance making the criminal question his motives and change to adapt to a new opponent.(8/10)

 cristoph

Director Review: Michel Gondry – Creates a fun non–serious comic book film that entertains. (7/10)

 

Action: The action scenes are all well put together given Kato some great fight sequences. (8/10)

Comedy: Light comedy throughout making fun at how other comic partnerships always seem to work so smoothly. (6/10)

Settings: Simple settings for the genre with nothing really adding too much to the story. (4/10)
Special Effects
: Good special effects for the slow motion fighting scenes, but otherwise not need. (6/10)

Suggestion: This is one to try, if you are a fan of Rogen you will enjoy it but otherwise this may be too silly for you. (Try It)

 

Best Part: Kato first fight.

Worst Part: Too much Rogen comedy.

Action Scene Of The Film: Final Showdown.

Funniest Scene: Kato and Britt fight.

Kill Of The Film: Chudnofsky

Believability: No (0/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: Not with the box office and it got bad reviews.

Post Credits Scene: No

Similar Too: Super

 

Oscar Chances: No

Box Office: $227,817,248

Budget: $120 Million

Runtime: 1 Hour 48 Minutes

Tagline: Protect the law by breaking it.

 

Overall: Fun Comic book film

Rating 70

Categories
Movie Review

The Box (2009)

logoDirector: Richard Kelly

Writer: Richard Kelly (Screenplay) Richard Matheson (Short Story ‘Button, Button’)

Starring: Cameron Diaz, James Marsden, Frank Langella, James Rebhorn, Holmes Osborne, Celia Weston

 

Plot: Norma (Diaz) and Arthur Lewis (Marsden), a suburban couple with a young child, receive a simple wooden box as a gift, which bears fatal and irrevocable consequences. A mysterious stranger delivers the message that the box promises to bestow upon its owner $1 million with the press of a button. However, pressing this button will simultaneously cause the death of another human being somewhere in the world, someone they don’t know. With just 24 hours to have the box in their possession, Norma and Arthur find themselves in the cross-hairs of a startling moral dilemma and must face the true nature of their humanity.

 

Verdict: Thought Provoking Thriller

 

Story: What looks like it will just test you on whether you would press the button, turns into a conspiracy thriller mixed with alien invasion or testing. This all comes off very clever but also outsmarts itself at times. You really have to see this a couple of times to really understand everything that is going on, but if you go in knowing this is from the Donnie Darko and Southland Tales director you will know it will try to confuse you but also give you the answers. If you are trying to find a smart thriller this is a story that really puts some of the over the top films to shame. (8/10)

 

Actor Review

 

Cameron Diaz: Norma the wife in the situation to change her life forever with the money and that would help her have the surgery on her disfigured foot. Good performance from the actress who is most well known for her glamourize roles, turns in to a regular house wife well. (8/10)

 cameron

James Marsden: Arthur astronaut hopeful who dreams are dashed but with the chance to get some money things start to change. Good performance but at times he looks a bit lost in what the character should be doing. (7/10)

 

Frank Langella: Arlington the mysterious disfigured man who offers the family a chance to make a million dollars at the push of a button, but is there something out of this world about him. Good performance showing how the power of mystery. (8/10)

 frank

Director Review: Richard Kelly – As a big fan of both his other films I found this a perfect fit for his abilities to make you really think about what is happening. (9/10)

 

Mystery: You will be questioning every action the characters take during the film. (9/10)

Sci-Fi: Looking into the idea that something is trying to check up on us rather than taking over. (9/10)

Thriller: Really keeps you thinking from start to finish. (9/10)

Settings: All very planned settings to add something to each scene and each moment of the story. (9/10)
Special Effects
: With few uses of effects rather focusing on mind set the few moments that are used all look very good. (8/10)

Suggestion: I think this really needs to be given a chance, but you will have to give the film your full concentration to enjoy it. (Try It)

 

Best Part: A simple idea turned into something very smart.

Worst Part: Blink you might miss something.

Believability: No (0/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: No

Post Credits Scene: No

 

Oscar Chances: No

Box Office: $33,333,531

Budget: $30 Million

Runtime: 1 Hour 56 Minutes

Tagline: You are the experiment.

Trivia:Norma and Arthur are based on Richard Kelly’s real parents

 

Overall: Smart Thriller

Rating 85

Categories
Movie Review

Leprechaun: Origins (2014)

logoDirector: Zach Lipovsky

Writer: Harris Wilkinson (Screenplay)

Starring: Stephanie Bennett, Andrew Dunbar, Melissa Roxburgh, Brendan Fletcher, Garry Chalk, Teach Grant, Dylan Postl

 

Plot: Backpacking through the lush Irish countryside, two unsuspecting young couples discover a town’s chilling secret. Ben (Dunbar), Sophie (Bennett), David (Fletcher) and Jeni (Roxburgh) quickly discover the idyllic land is not what it appears to be when the town’s residents offer the hikers an old cabin at the edge of the woods. Soon, the friends will find that one of Ireland’s most famous legends is a terrifying reality.

 

Verdict: What Was That?

 

Story: Leprechaun was one of the funniest horror films in the 90s filled with plenty of comical horror. Warwick Davis created a horror icon that you loved and one that could make you laugh even when he was chopping up bodies. This will shock you because all of the comedy is gone. The four friends are all generic gap year students who pretend they know stuff and are very disrespectful to the locals. The only good thing I found in this was that I liked the idea of having village lure people in to sacrifice them to the leprechaun. It turns into a bog standard race to survive against a leprechaun that looks more like a goblin. (3/10)

 

Actor Review

 

Stephanie Bennett: Sophie the lead who because she is a history buff she agrees to go to the location thinking she could find a real historical find. She is the one who reads into what is going on but he plans work as well as a chocolate teapot. She does well with what little she has to work with. (5/10)

 

Andrew Dunbar: Ben the only reluctant member of the group but goes because Sophie wants to and agrees to go. He shows some signs of his real nature while in the chase. Plays the cowardly leading male well but doesn’t have much to work with. (4/10)

 

Melissa Roxburgh: Jeni the standard support character that goes through the most while trying to escape the creature. Does what she needed to do and screams and cries a lot. (4/10)

 

Brendan Fletcher: David the remaining member of the friends who goes through the most but shows signs of loyalty to the people in his group. Does what he can with the script that doesn’t really offer anyone anything. (4/10)

 

Dylan Postl: Leprechaun the creature after them. I was expecting him to be the reborn Warwick Davis style leprechaun, I was very wrong. (3/10)

 

Director Review: Zach Lipovsky – You had one job, and this is what you give us. (2/10)

 

Horror: Has few scares but the creature would be frightening to meet. (3/10)

Settings: Setting works a little bit but doesn’t get the full effect it should. (5/10)
Special Effects
: Solid creature creation and kills. (5/10)

Suggestion: Don’t bother with this waste of time for a horror film. (Avoid)

 

Best Part: There isn’t one.

Worst Part: Leprechaun is now a goblin.

Kill Of The Film: Ben

Believability: No (0/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: It could, I hope not though.

Post Credits Scene: No

 

Oscar Chances: No

Runtime: 1 Hour 30 Minutes

 

Overall: Terrible Horror Reboot

Rating 5

 

Categories
Movie Review

Locke (2013)

logoDirector: Steven Knight

Writer: Steven Knight (Screenplay)

Starring: Tom Hardy

 

Plot: Ivan Locke, a dedicated family man and successful construction manager, receives a phone call on the eve of the biggest challenge of his career that sets in motion a series of events that threaten his careful cultivated existence.

 

Verdict: Engrossing Film

 

Story: Such a simple story unfolding watching Locke try and make up for one mistake in his life but ends up losing everything in the process. Nothing that unfolds is unbelievable which creates a very real feel to everything and watching it through the eyes of only Locke pulls you in to each problem he is facing. There really isn’t anything else to talk about, it is just one man’s problems and how he is facing them. (9/10)

 

Actor Review

 

Tom Hardy: Ivan Locke high ranking successful foreman on a construction site, family man who has made a mistake by having a one night stand with a lady who decided to keep the baby. He has to walk away from the biggest moment of his career, tell his wife the truth, all while trying to get to the hospital to see his new baby be born. Great performance from Hardy who is the only person on screen and keeps your attention from start to finish talking about such simple life matters. (9/10)

 hardy

Director Review: Steven Knight – Great direction to create a simple story that pulls you in from start to finish. (8/10)

 

Drama: One man dealing with such real problems works perfectly. (9/10)

Settings: All set within Locke’s car as he is making his journey. (10/10)

Suggestion: When I suggest this I am not going to lie, I was expecting a thriller like he had committed some sort of crime, I was hugely surprised with what we got but also impressed with it too. I would suggest trying it as I feel it won’t be for everyone. (Try it)

 

Best Part: Hardy’s performance

Worst Part: You could nit-pick on length.

Believability: Could easily be a real situation. (9/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: No

Post Credits Scene: No

 

Oscar Chances: No

Runtime: 1 Hour 25 Minutes

Tagline: No Turning Back

 

Overall: Brilliant Drama

Rating 87

Categories
Movie Review

Scooby Doo! Pirates Ahoy! (2006)

logoDirector: Chuck Sheetz

Writer: Margaret M. Dean, Jed Elinoff, Scott Thomas (Screenplay)

Starring: (Voice Talents) Frank Welker, Casey Kasem, Mindy Cohn, Grey DeLisle, Ron Perlman, Freddy Rodriguez, Tim Conway, Edie McClurg, Kathy Najimy, Arsenio Hall, Dan Castellaneta

 

Plot: Scooby and the gang take a mystery-themed cruise through the Bermuda Triangle, but what starts out as staged hi-jinks soon turns into the real thing. Ghost pirates are prowling the legendary waters of the Triangle, searching for a priceless treasure and someone on board the cruise ship may hold the secret to it’s location. Now Scooby and the rest of gang will have to solve the real mystery behind the mysterious treasure or they may end up walking the plank to sink to the depths of Davy Jones’ Locker!

 

Verdict: Fun Filled Family Adventure

 

Story: We only watch these films to see where the gang end up, as they always end up in a position where there is a mystery to solve. Putting the gang on a mystery cruise only for them to ruin the trip for everyone before the real mystery begins. The case is always larger than the TV series mysteries and usually has a few more twists and turns. It really does what it needs to do and will keep the fans entertained. (7/10)

 

Character Review

 

Scooby Doo: The most famous Great Dane gets up to his usual here, with his stomach taking over, but unlike other films he knows when things get personal he will step up instead of waiting for a Scooby Snack. (7/10)

 scooby

Fred: With his parents inviting the gang on the cruise, he gets all embarrassed by them, but his plan as always goes slightly wrong before he takes full control to save his parents. (7/10)

 

Shaggy: Typical Shaggy performance whose stomach always comes first, but his nose helps the gang get to safety when the gang is in danger. (7/10)

 shaggy

Velma: The brains of the gang who puts together the mystery and as always she knows who did it. (7/10)

 

Daphne: Always comes over as a bit of a diva but always ends up being a lot smarter than she is given credit for, she uses her resources to get the gang free.(7/10)

 

Captain Skunkbeard: The captain who is after a buried treasure in the Bermuda Triangle, he is capturing any ship that comes close and building an army of ghost pirates. (7/10)

 captain

Rupert Garcia: The man that Captain Skunkbeard is after as he has the answer to where the treasure is. (7/10)

 

Director Review: Chuck Sheetz – Good direction to create everything you want in a Scooby Doo film. (7/10)

 

Animation: Good animation showing you don’t need all the best animation for a good film. (7/10)

Comedy: Normal level of comedy for a Scooby film that gives enough laughs without it being a full blown comedy. (7/10)

Family: Good for the whole family to watch. (9/10)

Mystery: Always good for a ‘who done it’ without being too confusing. (8/10)

Settings: Good setting using the Bermuda Triangle and its history to add to the mystery. (9/10)

Suggestion: These films will always be good for the family to watch as they have enough entertainment to keep everyone happy. (Kids And Family Watch)

 

Best Part: Bermuda Triangle idea works well.

Worst Part: Not enough potential suspects.

Funniest Scene: Costume pick.

Believability: No (0/10)

Chances of Tears: No (0/10)

Chances of Sequel: This is a franchise that will go on and on.

Post Credits Scene: No

 

Oscar Chances: No

Runtime: 1 Hour 20 minutes

 

Overall: Fun Family Film

Rating 70